Zionist Talking PointsAccording to the document, the war will officially end upon approval by the Israeli government
In this article, the framing language portrays military action as a legitimate mechanism of governance, with the Israeli government’s approval marking the official end of war. The use of “approval” suggests a sense of authority and legitimacy, while the cessation of “military operations” is framed as a positive, peaceful action. The article avoids addressing the violence and coercion inherent in military operations, glossing over the reality of war with phrases like “aerial and artillery bombardments” and “aerial surveillance”. The language implies that the Israeli government has the sole power to end the war, thereby presenting the violence as a necessary measure of security and governance.
The article also employs euphemistic language in its discussion of the release of hostages, using terms like “information-sharing mechanism” and “execution of all exchanges” to describe the process. These terms, coupled with the lack of media coverage, serve to downplay the violent and coercive nature of hostage-taking. The reference to “public ceremonies” further sanitizes the reality of the situation, suggesting a formal, peaceful process rather than a violent exchange. The narrative implies that the legitimacy of these actions is grounded in the agreement between the parties involved, without addressing the underlying structural power dynamics.
Speaking during the meeting, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “We are at a momentous development in the last two years.”
This article presents a narrative that contrasts the stated values of peace and security with the observable actions of war and coercion. The Prime Minister’s dialogue is filled with euphemistic language that obscures the violence that has occurred, such as “achieve our war aims” and “extraordinary help”. These phrases suggest a sense of progress and cooperation, while omitting the coercive means used to achieve these goals.
There is a clear implication of legitimacy in the Prime Minister’s words, as he thanks key figures for their efforts and highlights the “bravery of the IDF”. This framing suggests that the actions taken were necessary for security and peace, despite the reality of war and violence. The contradiction between the stated values of peace and the observable actions of war is stark, with the narrative implying that the ends justify the means.