Spin Watch (10/12/25)

Three Qatari diplomats killed in car crash near Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, just ahead of a major summit aimed at ending the war in Gaza, set to be chaired by Presidents Trump and al-Sisi.

The language in this headline implies a connection between the car crash and the upcoming summit on Gaza, thereby subtly coercing the reader to see these events as linked, with an underlying suggestion of a conspiracy or foul play. The use of the phrase “major summit aimed at ending the war in Gaza” can be perceived as a way to legitimize the actions of certain political leaders and governments that may not necessarily have the best interests of the people of Gaza at heart. The phrase also fails to acknowledge the complex and violent power dynamics at play in the region.

The use of the term “war” implies an equal distribution of power and resources between the two parties involved in the conflict, which is not accurate considering the asymmetrical power dynamics between Gaza and its adversaries. This euphemistic language serves to mask the realities of the conflict and the violence inflicted upon the people of Gaza.

Original Article


Palestinian Authority official charged with ‘national security’ harshly criticizes Hamas leadership for bringing ‘destruction and ruin’ to Gaza.

This headline employs the phrase “charged with ‘national security'” in a way that insinuates legitimacy and authority to the Palestinian Authority official in question. However, it does not provide any structural grounding for this legitimacy. This could be seen as a method of framing that attempts to amplify the official’s criticisms of Hamas.

The language used to describe Hamas’s impact on Gaza, “destruction and ruin”, is presented without context or explanation. This simplification of a complex situation does not account for the roles of other actors in the conflict, nor does it acknowledge the systemic and structural violence inflicted upon those living in Gaza. This framing serves to demonize Hamas, without providing a nuanced understanding of the conflict.

Original Article