"The real problem is Arab antisemitism."

Argument

Supporters claim that criticism of Israel fuels antisemitic attacks worldwide, arguing that protests, anti-Zionist rhetoric, and media focus on Israeli policy inspire hatred against Jews everywhere. They highlight data showing spikes in antisemitic incidents during Israel-related protests.

Counterpoint

Antisemitic incidents often rise during Israel–Palestine conflict, but around 58 percent of these are directly tied to anger at Israel’s policies, not solely Jewish identity. The Anti-Defamation League found that political backlash at Israel was a major driver of hate crime, indicating state actions fuel responses, rather than pre-existing global antisemitism.

Experts like Brian Klug and Tony Judt warn that labeling legitimate criticism as antisemitic can suppress free speech and worsen the problem. When criticism is silenced, grievances fester and backlash intensifies. Distinguishing between hate and protest targeting policy is essential to address true antisemitism without stifling political debate.

Spin

  • Blame shift: Framing dissent as antisemitism places responsibility on protesters instead of addressing state conduct.
  • Speech chilling: Equating critique with hate discourages open criticism of Israeli policy and erodes democratic debate.
  • Weaponized definitions: Broad IHRA-style definitions label valid policy critique as prejudice.
  • Feedback loop: Suppressing criticism can fuel resentment and increase the risk of real antisemitic backlash.

Sources